Condemned: Criminal Origins

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: optimization (5 vs 6) - Intel gathering and exploiting known weaknesses solves fights

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 0) - Bandits and skags are scripted

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 0) - mutants and bandits follow scripts

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 0) - human and mutant AI is mappable

Both lean on reads about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (5 vs 6) - Bow aim, melee timing, beast control under pressure

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 0) - Cops follow simple scripts; nothing adapts

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 5) - Anomalies, mutant spawns, and artifact RNG hide information

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 0) - Demon spawns are scripted triggers, not adaptation

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 3) - Patrol spawns and reinforcements add mild unpredictability

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: optimization (5 vs 6) - Resource routing, enemy spawn knowledge, episode mastery once mapped.

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: reads (1 vs 0) - no adaptive opponent

Both lean on execution about the same (5 vs 5). Biggest difference: variance (4 vs 3) - Emergent physics chaos and patrol randomness.